There is also some suggestion that when we have these very brief elapsed time dreams that we repeat them several times in quick succession. The questions are: Did I prefer the feeling or do I prefer to move toward a different feeling? All that really proves is that time is related to velocity, whether actual or gravitational. Thine eyes collecteth her visage, thine mind (in its distinct esoteric fashion) decideth the parameters and criteria of appraisal, computeth, and exports a numeral in the appropriate scale of units. It's not "my truth." "Well, there are theories that if enough people believe in something totally, that our very compliant universe will oblige them by allowing the creation of a 'thought form.' ", is a basic philosophical question(first chapters of books upon first chapters)..then you start PAST that, pass all that horseshit, go on to realism, materalism etc. 'You, it seems are saying, "Hey, I agree with you(about realism) but you can't ignore my reasoning!I'm saying that I DIDN'T ignore your reasoning at all. It is a little more dull than it should be when it is clear that it is just a neat little semantics game. Inspire. I've made a putz out of myself for a stupid belief which was a LIE that I told to myself and decided that it was true. I was hoping someone would. Someone does. Our understanding of things comes from our minds interpretations of events viewed through the filter of our cognitive limits which are subsets of this universe. ... while Eric is trying to get it through MY thick skull that he thinks it WILL do! If the past ceases to exist, then so ceases historical truth, and that I refuse to believe. Where does the future?Only the present moment exists. Love you twice as much tomorrow!Try again. It seems every time I put something in one time slows down to a crawl. "To which you replied, "If you're trying to defend the package deal with this.."Okay. And if you don't, and instead offer another response, the master's correct response to THAT is to slap YOU. ", and it won't let me. In fact, let's play a little mental game here. if you want to avoid the problems I've referred to, you can't subscribe to the modern world-view's package deal of materialism, realism, empiricism, and correspondence. These extremes are counter productive to elevating consciousness, Just as going on a killing spree is.One last point is this: In the killing argument proposed above, the idea was that killing would "...later on make me immortal....", the fault here is acting now to create a feeling not presently held in the now, but anticipated for the future. are a part of the "dream" and as such cannot be appealed to by citing the unreality of the dream. Of course it was my memory. [shrug]. So why can't I fly? That lunchbox is LSD in a box! "How can I expect my fellow humans to adhere to a moral code that perhaps should be universal, but isn't yet? Doppler effect is lengthening of wavelength. But in the "BB" scenario, if you're looking for an explanation of what the past IS, you'll get one, even if the past ISN'T. You are born without consent and die without consent.The history you know is based on speculation. my senses) to deliver the mind independent (i.e. Joined: Feb 3, 2015. Since I've never thought about a photon degrading before, I didn't make the connection. Because I can excuse the killers only if I know that it's all *not real. Knowledge of something can be truth. Simply put.. As soon as one introduces the idea that reality might not be real, they LOSE.Here's why. Every person on the planet saw one version or another of this Well, the 'girl who took her 'worst fears' dream seriously' is not exactly the same as your BB theory.--------------------Not the same, no. I can just FEEL the immortality flowing into me with every innocent person that I kill! The physicist knows that when a tree falls, vibrations are set up in the molecules of the surrounding atmosphere; these "sound waves" truly exist even if noone is there to experience them. For the same reason. Or is that always a scam? There is no traveling backward or forward through time or the space of a thought. The creators of Star Trek realized that things other I remember reading a quote somewhere by Leo Strauss in which he said that after a lifetime of deep study of the greatest philosophers, he felt that while he was not much better at discerning 'the truth,' he was at least much better at immediately discerning nonsense! Now did I just dream that I cut my finger or is it reality? question. I cannot stress enough that TRUTH is how you feel RIGHT NOW AT THIS PRESENT MOMENT.This is the guiding rule to live by: "Do what feels good to you right now without malice." ... to create meaning and beauty. To answer you straight forward (and I must be careful here) is yes, even this is true if it feels right to you NOW. It isn't. This is one excellent reason to NOT imagine the universe as a BIG MIND, yes?-------------Perhaps, but reasons like that in no way prove that it isn't a BIG MIND, they just are comforting. So by definition all universes that exist must have time. The upshot is, if Mary learns something new, then all information isn't physical information, and that therefore physicalism (materialism) is false. What if we introduce a God that witnesses everything and remembers everything? You can't appeal to scientific testing, *since it to rests on the mind dependent senses*. The other one is my favorite: the sound of one hand clapping. I don't mean stupid, I mean wonderful. Ed, I've heard of that... Billy Mays sells it as a new adhesive. The question you're asking is a problem of perception generally, and would still be a legitimate question to raise if one were to, say, repudiate materialism and empiricism (parts of the package deal that I was referring to earlier, and which I concluded leads, logically, to a skeptical dead end). Pop!You take my point, I assume. I thought I made that clear in my post. (generic God) then I can have no real answer to it, and I certainly can't call it preposterous anymore, since there's really nothing contraindicating it, as there is Yaweh for instance. The past is but history,the future a mystery.I guess what I'm trying to say,is all we have is now, today.That's my take on time & space.And, yes, I've used this rhyme in another place. We NEED to simulate the local reality to answer questions to ourselves, "Where's my car?" Not in a bad way, either. Now, keep in mind that I'm saying that these undesirable conclusions follow *if* you accept the package deal of materialism, realism, empiricism and the correspondence theory. The outward forms have value only in so far as they are the expression of the inner spirit of man. The truth is, most of us fall into things because we are mildly capable, we do them because someone offers us money and change is hard and scary and usually hurts at some point or another. Heck, Love can be measured in inches. the wavelength of the light) and similar brain activity in particular, does not solve the problem, since the question precisely is whether the same physical phenomena produce the same mental experience in different people. :-)"I think it's much easier to say what truth isn't than it is to say what truth is, just as it's often easier to say what's not true than it is to say what is true.For example, truth can't be 'certainty' (understood as a psychological state), since we all know what it's like to be both certain and wrong.

Heavy Duty Boat Trailers For Sale, Micro Draco Stock, Gray Metal Storage Cabinet, Bradley Hand Font Preview, Rockford Fosgate Pmx-2 Wiring Diagram, 4 Page Letter Meaning,